Research earns its place when it changes the next decision.
Who this is for
Teams with one consequential market question and too much at stake for a generic answer.
1
A market looks attractive, but the decision is still built on assumptions.
You need a local read of the category, channel, and buyer before committing budget or people.
2
The board wants a defensible answer to one question.
The decision is narrow enough to frame, but consequential enough that desk research alone will not carry it.
3
A commercial hypothesis needs testing before execution starts.
You want to know what is true in the market, what is still uncertain, and which move should follow.
What you get
A complete sprint in three phases. The sequence is fixed; the evidence plan is specific to
your question.
1Frame
Turn the brief into one decision
We define the question, the decision it unlocks, and the evidence that would change your mind.
A decision statement and working hypothesis
Clear market, category, and channel boundaries
An agreed evidence plan before research starts
2Test
Read the market through a local operator
A named expert tests the hypothesis against current market structure, local sources, and relevant operator perspectives.
Category, channel, and competitor evidence
Local interpretation of what the data means
Explicit gaps, contradictions, and decision risks
3Decide
Leave with a recommendation, not a report handoff
The findings are translated into a decision and the next phase required to act on it.
A concise findings and implications readout
A clear recommendation with decision conditions
The next scope, if the evidence supports moving
The questions a sprint can answer
The subject can vary. The discipline does not: one question, one market, one decision.
Demand and category reality
Is the category large enough, mature enough, or changing in a way that makes this move timely?
Route-to-market feasibility
Which channel can carry the product, where does margin disappear, and what would a workable route require?
Competitive and pricing position
Who already owns the shelf or buyer relationship, and where could your proposition credibly sit?
Commercial and regulatory constraints
Which local requirements, operating norms, or structural barriers could change the decision before launch?
A named expert owns the answer
The lead expert is matched to the market and question, and stays accountable from framing
through recommendation. These already-public strategists show the operator profile we
field:
RH
Rob Hall
GourmetPro Expert
Market entry strategist
Japan · APAC
Food and beverage, FMCG
25 years of brand and commercial work across Asian markets, including Tokyo, Singapore, and Bangkok; previously at Suntory Holdings.
AH
Anthony Harb
GourmetPro Expert
Market entry strategist
Australia · New Zealand
Food, beverage, FMCG
FMCG entrepreneur with 25 years launching brands into retail and foodservice; former private-label buying manager at Franklins Supermarkets.
MS
Matthew Smith
GourmetPro Expert
Brand and market strategist
United States
Beverage and CPG
Former director of brand marketing at Dr Pepper Snapple Group; led marketing and e-commerce at Steuben Foods' Elmhurst 1925.
What this sprint is not
Not a syndicated-data subscription
We use relevant sources, but the value is the expert's interpretation of one decision in one market.
Not an open-ended research programme
The question and stopping point are agreed before the work starts, so scope does not expand into a general market survey.
Not a report that ends the relationship
The sprint is framed as the first phase of a larger decision. If the answer is go, the next execution scope is explicit. If it is no-go, the work has still done its job.
How the engagement is shaped
Project engagement: a fixed-fee sprint over a few weeks, scoped to one market question and one decision.
Subscription cadence: recurring diagnostics for teams that need the same local expert to test new questions as the market changes.
Both shapes end with a recommendation and an explicit next scope, not an obligation to continue.
This is closest to our Project engagement
shape. Recurring diagnostics are scoped to the agreed cadence. Signed band details live on
How We Work.
If the evidence says move
The sprint is the first phase of a larger commercial decision. It does not roll into a
bigger engagement by default.
Build the market entry
When the decision is to enter, the diagnostic becomes the evidence base for a separate route-to-market and execution scope.
Narrow enough that the answer changes a real decision. A useful question names the market, the category or channel, and the choice in front of you. If the brief contains several decisions, we separate the first one from the questions that depend on it.
Is this a replacement for Mintel, Nielsen, or another data platform?
No. Those platforms provide broad datasets and syndicated category views. A market diagnostic uses the relevant evidence available, then adds a named local operator who can interpret what it means for your specific decision. The output is a recommendation, not access to a database.
What happens if the answer is no-go?
Then the sprint has prevented a larger, more expensive mistake. You receive the evidence, the conditions that drove the recommendation, and the points that would need to change before the decision should be revisited.
Can the same expert stay involved after the sprint?
Yes, when the next phase needs the same market judgment. The sprint defines that scope rather than assuming it. You can stop after the diagnostic, commission another question on a subscription cadence, or move into a separate execution engagement.
Bring us the decision behind the question
Tell us the market, the commercial question, and what the answer needs to unlock. We will
tell you whether a diagnostic sprint is the right first phase.